Congregation of the Mission: Institutes

NGO | SIEV | CIF | VSI | MEGVIS | VSO

Sixth Annual Meeting of COVIAM Formators

Assessment of Vincentian Seminarians

(Files presented as Received)

A.  Definitions:

            1) Assessment:   To officially estimate the value of a seminarian as the basis for promotion to the next level of formation? To vows? To ordination?

           2) Evaluation:    To determine or set the value, to appraise.

B.  Value would be determined by the presence of the habits needed to participate fully in the mission of the Congregation of the Mission in Africa/Madagascar.  Lived experience with the students would verify the presence or absence of needed habits.

C.  Habits are;    "For our purposes, we will define a habit as the intersection of knowledge, skills and desire.  KNOWLEDGE is the theory - the what to do and the why. SKILL is the how to do it. DESIRE is the motivation -he want to do.  In order to make something a habit in our lives, we have to have all three."  Stephen Covey/Seven Habits of Highly Effective People.

D.  An assessment will be influenced by the climate or atmosphere or mood of the entire formation program.

            1.  This climate has been established through the quality of the regular interactions

                 between formator and student, student and student and formator and formator.

            2.  The climate has been established by a regular declaration of the principles that

                 program and house live their lives by.  The students know then the standards

                 by which they are being evaluated and have been expected to make habitual in

                 their lives.  Included in this is a public and frequent statement about the understanding

                 of vocation that is operative in the formation program.  Karl Rahner once said that

                 the surest sign of a vocation is having the gifts (read habits) to do it.  

            3.  The climate has been established through the example of the formators, especially if

                 the formators exhibit love, reverence and interest for the seminarians.

E.  An evaluation/assessment of a seminarian is an attempt to get reliable and realistic

     information concerning the presence/absence of the habits we believe are essential to living

     our way of life.

     1.  Various sources of realistic information;   the formators, the students, the student

           himself, his pastoral supervisor, the people he worked with in pastoral, the people he

           served.  The more perspectives the better the assessment.

     2.   An assessment/evaluation needs a process which is known and understood by all the

           parties involved.

            a.   Goal of the process:   advancement to the internal seminary, etc.

            b.   Procedure; what happens first, second, etc.

            c.   Clarity of roles; who is going to do what, who sees the results.

            d.   The process needs an instrument and/or venue.

                        1.  Questionnaire;

                                    a.  Closed questions.    Ask for specific information.  Problem is they

                                         control the information given.  Easy to collate though..

                                    b.  Open-ended questions.  Give the respondents the greatest freedom

                                         in answering.  Hard to collate the responses.

                        2.  Interview;   along the lines of a the confrontational coaching conversation.

                             Needs to be structured.

                        3.  A focus group;

                                    a. A group that is asked to "focus" on a specific question, issue, concern,

                                        person snd give its reaction to it.

                                    b. First, you need to determine what kind of information you want.

                                        1.  Open questions.

                                        2.  Closed questions.

                                    c.  Second you need to select the group.  6-12 is the best.  More variety

                                         greater the perspective.  If you select only elephants you will only

                                         get an elephant's view of the world.

                                    d.  Third step; set up the meeting.

                                                1) Informal setting to encourage conversation.

                                                2) One to one and a half hours.

         3) Keep a record of what is said.  A secretary who is not a participant.

                                                4) Leader is facilitator.  Keeping people on track, maintaining order.

                                           *Remember consensus is not the goal here, but an understanding of what people think.

                        4.  A professional instrument.  But the person administering would have to know

                             how to process the results.

                                    a.  Psychological testing.

                                    b.  Myer's? Briggs or Enneagram.

            e.  The process needs a way of communicating the results and coming to some closure.